I recently visited a large
local primary school to collect gifts of produce from its Harvest Thanksgiving
service which was being donated to a local charity. During my visit, I spent
some time talking with the newly appointed Head Teacher and was most impressed
with his initial evaluation of the school and his plans for the future.
I have to confess that this
conversation evoked the great excitement and job satisfaction of my work as a
Quality Improvement Officer, the highlight of the final years of my career.
With others, my remit entailed working in partnership with the schools across
my local authority in the West Highlands to secure better outcomes for their
pupils. In practical terms, this meant challenging and supporting these schools
to self-evaluate and plan to improve their performance in all aspects of their
provision.
In Scotland, all schools are
committed to the principles and the processes of continuous improvement. This means that in each school, staff,
pupils, parents and the community work together to identify priorities, take
action and evaluate the impact of these actions on a continuous cyclical basis.
According to Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education, “at the heart of
self-evaluation are three questions:
✪ How
are we doing?
✪ How
do we know?
✪
What are we going to do now?
Excellent schools focus
these questions on learning. Learning is at the heart of an excellent school.
Learning is its core business.”
As a Quality Improvement Officer, I used a
document called ‘How Good is our School’ developed by Her Majesty’s
Inspectorate as ‘the Bible’ for school improvement.
‘How
Good is our School’ (HGIOS) identifies the key areas of a
school’s operation from the curriculum to assessment, pupil support, leadership
etc. In each area there is a series of quality indicators which are used to
evaluate performance using a six point scale. This scale ranges from the lowest
of ‘unsatisfactory’ to the highest which is ‘excellent’. According to HGIOS,
“an evaluation of ‘unsatisfactory’ applies when there are major weaknesses in
provision requiring immediate remedial action” whereas, “an evaluation of
excellent represents an outstanding standard of provision which exemplifies
very best practice and is worth disseminating beyond the school. It implies
that very high levels of performance are sustainable and will be maintained.”
As a born again Christian, I
have often wondered why Scotland’s evangelical churches and fellowships shy
away from self-evaluation and rarely plan for change, never mind improvement.
Indeed I often wonder whether our churches and fellowships have a clear
Biblical understanding of their ‘core business’?
It was in this context that
I was both surprised but delighted to read an article entitled, ‘Every Church Is a Revitalization Project’
by Erik Raymond in the online journal ‘Church leaders’ (www.churchleaders.com).
Referring to the long forgotten core principle of the Reformation, ‘semper
reformanda’ or ‘always reforming’, Eric Raymond
contends that……. ‘this work of ongoing revitalization is not fundamentally
different than major revitalization. At its core, there is the challenge to
keep shaping the church by the gospel. And this work never stops. Ironically,
when the work of ongoing revitalization stops, a church is soon to be a
candidate for major revitalization’.
What Erik Raymond is
advocating for a church/fellowship, is a commitment to continuous improvement
underpinned by a rigorous self-evaluation and improvement planning. Perhaps
Scotland’s evangelicals could develop their own self-evaluation tool which
could be entitled ‘How Good is our
Church’.
Pastor Raymond has even
provided a ‘starter for ten’ in his article. It contains a series of questions
that all members of a fellowship meeting together (NB all members must be
involved not just the pastor and elders/deacons) can prayerfully discuss
together, then plan for improvement. Imagine the difference that such a process
would make to the turgid and largely meaningless twice yearly church ‘business
meetings’…..more people would attend; engagement levels with the mission of the
church would increase; ordinary Christians would feel they have real ownership
of the church’s mission, rather than being asked to slavishly approve decisions
reached elsewhere by their so-called leaders.
Here are some sample starter
questions that could be used in the development of a ‘How Good is our Church’ self-evaluation tool:
·
How good are we at communicating the Word? Do
all members have a clear and deep understanding of our church/fellowship’s
statement of faith? Is there clear evidence that the word, empowered by the
Spirit is having an impact on the lives of believers?
·
How good are our gatherings?
Does the church value the Sunday gathering? Do people come to church, and when
they do, what is their disposition? Do they hunger for the Word preached? Is
there a real sense of the presence of God?
·
How good is our fellowship? Is
there a true sense of gospel-shaped community? Some indicators of this include welcome,
inclusion, hospitality, conversation, sacrificial service, etc. How good are we
at inclusion and making sure that all members are involved in ministry? (not
just making tea!)
·
How good is our pastoral care? Are
elders/deacons involved in regular home visitation? Is there real corporate
care for the elderly, vulnerable and needy?
·
How good is our engagement with the
local community? Would the community notice if our church
disappeared tomorrow? Does the church/fellowship have credibility with the
local community?
·
How good is our use social media to
connect with relevance to the local community? Is
the church in tune with and able to provide a rational and relevant Biblical
response local/national issues? Is social media used for the advancement of the
Gospel in the local community?
·
How good are we at evangelism/making
disciples in our locality? Are all members clear about
their responsibility to share the Gospel? Are all members confident and skilled
at sharing the Gospel? Does the church have a coherent strategy for the
perpetual evangelisation of its locality?
·
How good are we at training disciples? Are
people being equipped for ministry?
·
How good is our leadership at all
levels? Is servant leadership evident in all
ministry leaders. Do leaders invite feedback about their work? Do leaders speak
with humility? Do leaders conduct themselves with joyful humility like the
Apostle Paul? Are there effective systems in place to ensure that all leaders
are accountable to those they serve?
·
How good is prayer in the church? To
what extent is prayer a priority? How and with what frequency does the church come
together for focussed prayer? Does the church celebrate answers to prayer?
·
How good is decision-making in the
church? Is there a ‘bottom-up’ or ‘top down’ system?
How good are communications? Does the church operate in a transparent or
secretive manner?
I suppose that many people
will say that activities such as self-evaluation should not be done in the church
and that the idea of continuous improvement has no place in a gospel centred
community. Others will simply shy away from such a process because it is
perceived to be ‘too difficult’.
However, my experience is
that when these practices are adopted, improvement happens. Given that most
evangelical churches and fellowships are struggling to make an impact in their
own localities, and many are confusing ‘growth’ with ‘sheep shuffling’, perhaps
a little honest self-evaluation, accompanied by some fervent heartfelt prayer,
followed by a modest plan and committed, courageous actions might just turn the
tide.
To those who set their faces
against starting the process of church wide evaluative discussions, I
have one question: ‘What are you afraid of?’ The living God always honours
those who step out in faith.
The mantra of one my former
Pastors, an IBM executive prior to entering the ministry was: ‘if you fail to
plan you are planning to fail’. He was absolutely correct…..more of the same is
not an option!
Semper Reformanda!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment