As
a born again Christian, but not a card carrying member of any denomination, I
never cease to be saddened, angered and just plain amazed by the latest
nonsense from the Church of Scotland. Reading the comments on the Scotsman and
the Herald’s websites yesterday, it would seem that I am not alone. A large
number of ordinary people, some believers and others obviously non-believers
have been raising their voices.
There
are a number of recurring threads in the letters and posts in these newspapers.
Some people want the national church to take a clear Bible based stance on the
issues of the day, while others want the church to reflect ‘modern values’ and
be politically correct.
With
membership in freefall, a crisis in the recruitment and retention of ministers,
continued concerns over finance and buildings, the General Assembly, in its
latest suicidal act has allowed local congregations to recruit practising
homosexual ministers...all in the name of equality and political correctness.
Writing
in the Scotsman this week, Richard Lucas made a powerful observation when he
said:
“The
Church of Scotland’s latest affirmation that it rejects biblical Christianity
should remind us all that a group of nice people singing hymns in a building
with a pointy bit at one end, led by a person in ecclesiastical garb, does not
necessarily constitute a church.
There
are still many local Kirks where the message of Christianity is faithfully
preached, but it has been substituted by a bland and worldly moralism in many
others.
The
Christian answer to sin is forgiveness and transformation, not redefinition and
accommodation. In the words of Jesus: “You are the salt of the earth. But if
the salt loses its saltiness… it is no longer good for anything”.
Amid
the despair, there was also cynicism in the correspondence. One writer complained: “there was a time, not
so long ago, when reports of debates and decisions of the General Assembly were
top news in the newspapers and other media. Now it is just a talking shop and
few would care if it failed to meet next year”.
Adding
a little acerbic humour to the tragedy, Dr Euan Dodds wrote, “Groucho Marx
famously said: ‘These are my principles. If you don’t like them I have others.’
It seems the Church of Scotland is now saying the same thing.
While
holding a “traditionalist” position, congregations can opt out as and when they
please. The only difference, however, is that Groucho was joking.”
I
am in wholehearted agreement with Richard Lucas when he asserts that quasi-ecclesiastical
activity ‘does not constitute a church’. That being the case, the Bible
believing, born again Christians......the real church, should immediately leave
the Church of Scotland. They would be warmly welcomed by brothers and sisters
in the Free Churches and the in the growing independent evangelical sector. The
remaining rump would then be free to rebrand itself as a modern politically
correct, non-spiritual organisation. It could even rename itself as the Scottish
Welfare Philosophical and Debating Society for which oblivion would be guaranteed. Unlike Groucho Marx....I'm not joking!!!!
1 comment:
OOoo... wonder if you'll get some reaction to this one!
Post a Comment