I have just finished
watching the TV dramatisation of the ‘The House of Cards’ trilogy. It tells the
story of Francis Urquhart, a fictional politician whose ambition and lust for
power knows no bounds. Urquhart’s character, created by writer Michael Dobbs,
is a classic character study in the dark political arts made famous more than
500 years ago by the Italian diplomat, historian and political theorist Niccolò
Machiavelli.
In the TV series, Francis
Urquhart is superbly portrayed by actor Ian Richardson. Urquhart's rise to the top and the totally
cold and calculating ruthlessness with which he exercises power makes him an
excellent example of a ‘Machiavellian’ character. In ‘House of Cards’, Francis
Urquhart is known by his political colleagues and the media as ‘FU’, and also for
his catchphrase: "You might think that, I couldn't possibly comment."
According to the Oxford
English Dictionary Machiavellianism is: ‘the employment of cunning and duplicity
in statecraft or in general conduct’, and while it is not uncommon in the world
of politics, it is standard practice in the criminal underworld.
In the fictional world of
Mario Puzo’s ‘Godfather’ trilogy, Machiavellianism achieves its popular literary
apotheosis in the character of Michael Corleone. The film adaptation chronicles
the rise of the Corleone mafia family from the early 20th century
until the 1970s. A key feature of these
films is the growth and development of the main character, Michael Corleone,
superbly acted by Al Pacino who grows darker and more evil with every
Machiavellian act.
It is often said that art
imitates life, and a cursory examination of church history shows that
Machiavellian behaviour has been prevalent throughout its history. Indeed the
machinations of the Borgia family in the Catholic Church may have provided some
inspiration for Machiavelli. In a more contemporary setting, the lifestyle and
moral compass of many contemporary televangelists would certainly meet Machiavelli’s
criteria for sharp practice.
Jim Baumgaertel, editor of
the Christian website www.procinwarn.com
writes that: “Machiavelli taught that it was good to promote morals and ethics
and religious convictions among the people. These were important in order to
keep them under control and productive. Morals and ethics maintained stability
and order and peace.
The ruler himself, was under
no obligation to live by these same morals and ethics and religious convictions.
The ruler was above these things. He was beyond good and evil. The ruler had
the obligation to do whatever was necessary to maintain and extend his
political power.”
As a Scottish born again
Christian, I am tempted to ask those who are part of my country’s evangelical
leadership elite whether Machiavellian behaviour exists amongst its competing
factions.
I suspect that I may get
‘F.U.’s’ response of: "You might think that, we couldn't possibly
comment."